Meteorite ALH84001 Phoenix & Perchlorates Archea & Perchlorates Perchlorates everywhereMars Society Switzerland
No Methane on Mars!
By Guy Webster JPL, Pasadena, Calif. & Dwayne Brown, NASA Headquarters, Washington 19 Sept. 2013; NASA Note 2013-285 Comments by Pierre Brisson
PASADENA, Calif. -- Data from NASA's Curiosity rover has revealed the Martian environment lacks methane. This is a surprise to researchers because previous data reported by U.S. and international scientists indicated positive detections. The roving laboratory performed extensive tests to search for traces of Martian methane. Whether the Martian atmosphere contains traces of the gas has been a question of high interest for years because methane could be a potential sign of life, although it also can be produced without biology. "This important result will help direct our efforts to examine the possibility of life on Mars," said Michael Meyer, NASA's lead scientist for Mars exploration. "It reduces the probability of current methane-producing Martian microbes, but this addresses only one type of microbial metabolism. As we know, there are many types of terrestrial microbes that don't generate methane." Curiosity analyzed samples of the Martian atmosphere for methane six times from October 2012 through June and detected none. Given the sensitivity of the instrument used, the Tunable Laser Spectrometer, and not detecting the gas, scientists calculate the amount of methane in the Martian atmosphere today must be no more than 1.3 parts per billion. That is about one-sixth as much as some earlier estimates. Details of the findings appear in the Thursday edition of Science Express. "It would have been exciting to find methane, but we have high confidence in our measurements, and the progress in expanding knowledge is what's really important," said the report's lead author, Chris Webster of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. "We measured repeatedly from Martian spring to late summer, but with no detection of methane. "Webster is the lead scientist for spectrometer, which is part of Curiosity's Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) laboratory. It can be tuned specifically for detection of trace methane. The laboratory also can concentrate any methane to increase the gas' ability to be detected. The rover team will use this method to check for methane at concentrations well below 1 part per billion. Methane, the most abundant hydrocarbon in our solar system, has one carbon atom bound to four hydrogen atoms in each molecule. Previous reports of localized methane concentrations up to 45 parts per billion on Mars, which sparked interest in the possibility of a biological source on Mars, were based on observations from Earth and from orbit around Mars. However, the measurements from Curiosity are not consistent with such concentrations, even if the methane had dispersed globally. "There's no known way for methane to disappear quickly from the atmosphere," said one of the paper's co-authors, Sushil Atreya of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. "Methane is persistent. It would last for hundreds of years in the Martian atmosphere. Without a way to take it out of the atmosphere quicker, our measurements indicate there cannot be much methane being put into the atmosphere by any mechanism, whether biology, geology, or by ultraviolet degradation of organics delivered by the fall of meteorites or interplanetary dust particles. "The highest concentration of methane that could be present without being detected by Curiosity's measurements so far would amount to no more than 10 to 20 tons per year of methane entering the Martian atmosphere, Atreya estimated. That is about 50 million times less than the rate of methane entering Earth's atmosphere. Comments : The publication of these results is tough for anyone hoping there was a source of biogenic methane on Mars. Of course there were doubts, since previous identifications were made at the limit of instruments capacities. These doubts are now cleared and the odds of finding a still active life are dwindling. But the subject is not to be discarded. First, it is still possible to find prebiotic organic molecules. The farthest we will be able to go from inert matter towards life (consider, for example, finding the "nucleotides" molecules with which RNA and DNA are written), the farthest we will progress towards the understanding of the phenomenon and, given the very old age of most of the surface of the planet, Mars is the ideal place for this search. In this spirit, let’s wait for the drillings of Curiosity in the clays which lie at the foot of Mount Sharp. Moreover, we must not forget that the absence of life today does not mean absence of life a long time ago, on the surface or elsewhere. Life may have disappeared on account of adverse changes in the environment. It may also have taken shelter in underground pockets, secluded from the outside world (such pockets exist on Earth). These are the areas the exploration of which the ExoMars and Mars 2020 missions will begin. However, this will be only a “first try” as the drillings may be too shallow (maximum two meters while they should at least reach five meters ie minimum heat+water+pressure). Finally, the development of non-methane generating metabolisms is still a possibility! With all that, if eventually we find nothing we would anyway have learnt a lot and Life as we know it will appear even more precious than before. Pierre Brisson
Tunable Laser Sectrometer in action! (SAM intrument, laboratory test) Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Is Mars the origin of Life? Meteorite Y000593